Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Live by the Code

"Never broke into a car, never hot-wired a car.  Never broke into a truck.  'I shall not cause harm to any vehicle nor the personal contents thereof, nor through inaction let the personal contents thereof come to harm.'  It's what I call the Repo Code, kid.  Don't forget it - etch it in your brain.  Not many people got a code to live by anymore."
--Repo Man (1984, dir. Alex Cox)


     At one time, this land was dotted with video rental stores and, inside each of these stores, were staff-people, famously supercilious individuals known as video store clerks.  
     What was it like to work in a video store and what did life there consist of?  What did these clerks think about during the long days on their aching feet, walking back and forth, the phone ringing constantly, re-shelving movies and staring disapprovingly at customers' rental choices?  What did they dream about at night, after the job of collecting late fees and calling customers about overdue VHS tapes had drawn to a close?  What were their fears and anxieties, their hopes and aspirations?
     Video store life will be a prominent theme of this blog because, well, I work at one... which is somewhat unusual in 2020!  My aim is simple: to record as much as possible - of what I have experienced, first-hand or otherwise, of video store life - while there are still impressions, sensations, and experiences to be recorded; in other words, to be part-diarist, part-ethnographer.  Because video store work is viewed as menial, it has largely escaped serious study in the past, yet, as an endangered form of emotional labor, is more than worthy of being catalogued and recorded.
     I was born in 1978 and grew up in the era of video.  However, despite being a movie-lover throughout my teens and twenties, I did not work in a video store until I was 31, when I got a job at Best Video in Hamden, Connecticut.  (At this point, in 2010, video stores were closing their doors in large numbers across the country due mainly to the inroads of on-demand video streaming.)
     Though largely menial labor, video store jobs have traditionally come with some small prestige and cultural capital attached and I was enthusiastic about the prospect of working with movies.  I expected to like the job and I did, eventually, although the transition was rockier than I expected: I was no overnight sensation, that's for sure, no matter what talents and prior experience I brought with me.  Video store work is superficially easy, of course, but, like much other emotional labor, is also quirky and complicated: a job which rewards emotional investment but punishes over-investment - a tough line to toe, as I would learn! 
     I made all sorts of mistakes early on.  For example, a quiet, older couple were renting a DVD and I made the mistake of asking them if they planned to watch the movie in widescreen.  I was making small talk and was only going to make sure that they understood how to access the widescreen format on the DVD but they stared at me as though I were speaking a foreign language.  They clearly had no idea that the DVD had two formats in which to watch the film (widescreen and full screen), and nothing I could say made it any better... in fact, everything I said only made it worse!  After trying, and failing, to help them understand how the film's ratio corresponded to their TV screen, I gave up and simply encouraged them to watch the movie in widescreen.  So much for my big words - ugh!
     Due to this and other false starts, I became too gun-shy to talk to customers, about movies or most anything, and, therefore, rarely remembered people or their names, meaning that there was little continuity to my work interactions.  I was too proud to take the first step.  Most customers considered me nice but, probably, distant and effete.  The few times that I did recommend a movie, I would become enthused... so enthused, in fact, that I sometimes realized too late that I had probably over-sold the film.  Also, when customers would return these movies, I would ask them what they thought, sometimes right off the bat.  (Why I did this, I don't know: I, myself, hate being asked, as soon as the lights in the movie theater come up, "So, whadja think?!")  Sometimes they shared my enthusiasm but other times they did not - I tried to hold myself above such seeming trifles but the disagreements stung precisely because I had brought them upon myself (and unnecessarily).
     I was cocky and my hubris ultimately brought me down to earth: I had not yet mastered the art of matching people to movies... and movies to people.  You see, between customer and the movie that they desire (whether they know what it is or not) lies a lone person, a medium: the video store clerk.  But, as with any person who stands between and makes connections, I found that it can be a treacherous and, at times, lonely position to occupy.  (Think of a switchboard operator in the past: connecting caller to caller, listening to conversations but not taking part, and, ultimately, becoming emotionally desensitized to the work.)
    Years passed (imagine calendar pages blowing off in the wind!) and I stuck with the job: as time passed Best Video, if it was precious before, became even more invaluable.  In time, I became judicious: through the crucible of experience I emerged with a surer sense of what my duties were and a greater understanding of the unwritten contract between video store customer and clerk... something which I now call... the Video Store Clerk Code!
     (As I was preparing to write this, one of my sketched-out ideas below sounded familiar: upon investigation, I realized that I was paraphrasing one of the four maxims of philosopher H. Paul Grice's cooperative principle (I took a linguistics class about six years ago).  Realizing how appropriate they are, I have decided to incorporate all four of the maxims (quantity, relevance, manner, and quality, respectively), in my own words, into 1, 2, 3, and 4 below.  Thanks to Finegan's Language: Its Structure and Use (7th ed.) for my (admittedly) limited understanding!)
     (Also: the following list is not meant to be purely proscriptive (i.e. "don't do it that way; do this, instead") or descriptive ("this is what happens in video stores, take it for what it's worth") but a playful mixture of both.  I will leave it to the reader to discern which is which....)

(1)  The video store clerk will communicate with the customer on the basis that each understands the others' statements provide sufficient information, nothing more or less.   
This principle is illustrated by the following hypothetical exchange: 
"Gino!  How are you feeling?!"  
"Oh, I feel fine, thanks for asking."  
"Wait, didn't I hear that your house was crushed by Godzilla a few days ago?!"  
"True, it was while I was at the grocery store... but you didn't ask about my house."
Both interlocutors interpret this principle differently and their readings are illustrative.  Gino's friend interprets Gino's statement as that he feels fine and therefore nothing else significant is going on or has happened (i.e. no destroyed house).  Gino, on the other hand, replies with a statement that he feels is sufficient to answer the question given to him.  What is important here is that each interpretation/contribution to the speech act (i.e. conversation) relies upon the assumption that the other has an understanding of what information is necessarily sufficient to satisfy and complete the speech act (in other words, don't get hung up on the fact that those understandings don't always sync up!): the act of communication is to perceive and produce what one supposes will satisfy the other(s).  Neither interpretation is more or less correct: speech acts are necessarily cooperative so misunderstandings in this contested middle ground are inevitable (and, besides, this is a fairly exaggerated example!).  Video store clerks are a famously opinionated and talkative lot so it may seem that a principle hinging upon economy of expression strikes against our inner natures (perhaps so!).  Still, the nobler route is the better one.  When a customer is renting a movie and they ask what I think of it (a daring thing to do!), should I choose not to enter the fray, I reply either with a statement of utter ambiguity or "We here at Best Video draw no judgments... and, if we do, we will not admit it."  (Also see 4a below for a further possibility.)  This was the principle that I violated early on by communicating unnecessarily wordy concepts about widescreen vs. full screen or by asking people's opinions of my recommendations without them first volunteering the information.  And, because of the latter, here is the following:
(1a)  The video store clerk will never ask a customer returning a recommended movie what they thought of it. 
In essence, remember that the recommendation has been made is sufficient in itself.  One who recommends a film cannot control the viewer's experience of said film: simply leave it be and let nature take its course.  I learned the hard way that my enthusiasm for movie X may translate to customer Y but not Z (or vice versa... or neither!).  However, if the customer volunteers the opinion - positive or negative - let's discuss!  Additionally:
(1b)  When the video store clerk is able to make recommendations to the customer, recommend; when not able, improvise.  
This is a further elaboration of the principle of economy - what it means is that the clerk who is running out of recommendations need not despair but simply focus on statements which are sufficiently true, as in: "This movie got great reviews," "A few people have told me that this movie is really good," or, even the excessively vague, "This movie has been renting really well."  (Also see 4a & 5 below.)
(2)  The video store clerk will be relevant in communication with the customer.  
What this means, in practice, is: if I have just seen the greatest zombie movie of all time and I walk into work the next day, I do not bother families with young children and conservative older customers by recommending it... because it isn't relevant (no matter how good the film was)!  This is seemingly straightforward but sometimes hard to execute in the chaotic, distraction-laden environment of the video store.
(3)  The video store clerk will be orderly in communication with the customer.  
In practice, this means speaking and acting in such a way that avoids ambiguity and confusion.  In essence, there is an order to the way that things are done in a video store: follow any single transaction methodically from beginning to end and avoid shortcuts.  Of course, there are also more complicated applications.  For example, if a customer is interested in the history of Westerns, don't recommend that they start with Psychological Westerns, Western Noir, Revisionist Westerns, or Spaghetti Westerns; start, instead, at the beginning with The Virginian, Stagecoach, Destry Rides Again, My Darling Clementine, etc.  A favorite saying of mine is appropriate here: "do it right, do it once."
(4)  The video store clerk will communicate with the customer on the basis that each understands the other to be truthful.  
In practice, this usually translates to, simply, "be truthful."  So, if a customer asks where a section is, you tell them truthfully, or, if they ask your opinion on a movie, you are similarly truthful.  Of course, it works both ways: if I ask a customer what types of movies he or she likes, I assume that they will be truthful because, otherwise, it will make it more difficult for me to be able to do my job which is providing them with recommendations.  But, beware: this principle points out that the basis of communication between clerk and customer is based on the understanding that the other is truthful, not that the other is necessarily being truthful.  Think about it: no business, no matter what type, could operate effectively without such a foundation.  But it also creates unique situations, such as that contained in the following:
(4a)  If a customer (one who is not well-known to the clerk) is in the process of renting an awful movie and they ask what the clerk's opinion is of the motion picture in question, the clerk will lie and say that he or she has not seen it.  
In such a case, to be truthful may have deleterious effects (the clerk may be irrevocably labeled pretentious or pompous, for example) and an untruth (i.e. a lie) is justifiable; therefore, rely upon the fact that the customer assumes you to be truthful and move on!
(5)  The basis of the relationship between video store clerk and customer is the trust that customer will be guided to movie and clerk will be rewarded accordingly for their labor.
On the surface, this principle seems pretty straightforward: it simply codifies the relationship between customer and clerk and what each aims to achieve or gain through it.  If the relationship is healthy, customer is happy with movie while clerk is paid; if not, well....  But like other principles on this list, it's a bit deceptive: the key is not the outcomes, intended or otherwise, but that the relationship is based upon trust.  In other words, trust explains how the system works (when it works) in a straightforward sense (i.e. customer gets movie, clerk gets paid) but in unorthodox applications, as well: it is trust, for example, which empowers the clerk to rely so heavily, when required, on the assumption that what is said is held to be sufficient (1a & 1b) or the assumption that what is said is held to be truthful (4a).  In essence, the video store clerk observes, recognizes, and steps in to act when necessary (like the government exercising extra powers during a state of emergency) and it is trust which enables that to occur.  I learned long ago that the customer wants to feel good about their transaction: do what you can to make that happen (within reason, of course!).
(6)  The video store clerk will maintain a sense of cool detachment: observe and only act or intervene when required.  
(For all you Trekkies, this is a non-involvement clause somewhat akin to the Prime Directive.)  In practice, this often translates to giving the customer the benefit of the doubt, which can be difficult, especially when the first person to rent a DVD returns it scratched and claims to not know how it got that way, but... you do what you can!  This goes beyond the first principle and extends the economy of expression (say only what is sufficient) to demeanor and bearing: do only what is sufficient.  There is a lot of stimulation - visual, aural, and otherwise - at play in a video store and some overreact to this chaos: the clerk must, whenever and wherever possible, remain imperturbable and radiate calm, never fanning the flames of any particular situation.
(7)  The video store clerk will not cause harm to movies through either action or inaction: video tapes, discs, and other media will be left in a state at least as good or better than when found. 
This is an adaptation, of course, of the "Repo Code" from Repo Man quoted above but goes further to incorporate the ideas of Leave No Trace outdoor conservation ethics.  The application is straightforward: leave movies you encounter at least as well as you found them and, if possible, make them better.  Of course, as with everything on this list, it's not so simple.  At its best, the scope of this principle should be widened to include, not just movies, but potentially anything: whatever you encounter, leave it in the same state or make it better.
(8)  When all else fails, the clerk will simply inform the customer that most new releases are terrible.  
"Can I interest you in a musical or a horror film?  The One-Armed Swordsman or A Touch of Zen?  How about something by Wilder or Sturges?...  Sirk?... Lang?... Lubitsch?...  Hitchcock?!..."

     And so, the tribulations of the world's few remaining video store clerks, go on (and on and on and on...).  Taken together, the above principles allow the clerk to toe a line between emotion and non-emotion, to cultivate an economy of thought and action which is, potentially, infinitely sustainable.
     The next time you walk into a video store (if you have the pleasure of walking into a video store, that is!), observe discretely: where is that oft-maligned individual, the clerk?  Is he or she re-shelving a stack of movies?  Tracking down an overdue film over the phone?  Idly texting or web surfing on their phone?  Arguing with friends over the relative merits of Carpenter and Cronenberg?  Or just biding time 'til dinner?  Remember that, below the surface, there may be more at work: perhaps he or she is even some sort of Don Quixote... daydreaming of the days of chivalry and knights-errant, Bushido and samurai.
     The life of a video store clerk is always intense!

4 comments:

  1. That was an impressive, thorough, and interesting post! My response will be much less impressive, not particularly orderly, and possibly uninteresting. However, it’s an open blog, so here we go…
    I am barely successful as a movie renter; I cannot imagine being the clerk. Dealing with people can be difficult, but trying to figure out their likes and needs adds an interesting extra dimension to the craft. I guess it is good that video stores are generally happy places and even if a recommendation goes awry, it still might be the best thing that happened to a person that day!
    You state “…between customer and the movie that they desire (whether they know what it is or not) lies a lone person, a medium: the video store clerk...” One definition of medium is “the intervening substance through which impressions are conveyed to the senses.” I’m presuming a back-and-forth here…you need to figure out which movie to recommend by helping the customer figure out which movie they want. Which, if you do not know the customer, is basically magic.
    Questions (unless you aren’t allowed to give away any more of your secrets…):
    1. Do you have “safety” movies? Movies that, based on limited information, you could offer to almost anyone and have it be a decent guess?
    2. Do you have customers that you know very well, yet still cannot recommend movies because their tastes are so unpredictable and/or random?
    3. Do you have a set/maximum number or series of questions that you feel you can ask a customer to assist your recommendation?
    In continuing with this line of thought…you mention “… the unwritten contract between video store customer and clerk…” Most contracts are entered into by both parties. Therefore:
    4. What is the code for the customer? How can we help you help us…Allowing you to be more of a muse than a magician?

    Regarding “(1b) When the video store clerk is able to make recommendations to the customer, recommend; when not able, improvise.”:
    Is this exchange implicitly agreed upon by both parties, each knowing what it really means? Such as when the wait staff at a restaurant recommends the special (everyone knows they just need to get rid of it) or says, “A lot of people have been ordering that.” Basically, non-answers that continue the conversation, and to a degree, the dynamic between the two parties while both understanding/admitting that tonight is not the night that the best movie match will be made?

    The customer also has the opportunity to figure out with which clerk(s) they best sync. For example, I was at BVFCC and happened to choose 2 movies in a row that said, “Clerk X’s pick”. I happened to really like both movies. Obviously, more testing needs to be done, but I would imagine that if I find another movie that is Clerk X’s pick, I would be more likely to choose it and enjoy it. It is like finding the right person at the wine store to help you make a selection. Although recommendations are often based on gathered information, there are still personal variations/tendencies in each wine steward. I find that identifying the steward whose variation/tendencies are aligned with my own tends to yield the best results. (There is also the option of choosing to not take advice from those whom you know are not of similar minds/tastes.)

    And for the record, there have been many times when I wanted to discuss a movie I had just seen (actually bursting into the store and wanting to animatedly discuss something I had just seen….possibly recommended by a clerk…), but then I realize that 1 – everyone is actually working and taking up a clerk’s time, when there are other customers/clients waiting, may not be prudent, and 2 – loudly (or even not so loudly…it’s not a stadium) discussing a film in the store when nearby people may not have seen the movie and might not want to know what happens…well…definitely not prudent!

    Do you have dreams that you are back working at the store recommending movies?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Additionally:
      Yes, as a clerk, I can safely rely upon the fact that the video store's status as a "safe haven" will guarantee that many of my daily transactions are more pleasant than average (compare, for example, working at the DMV!). In truth, however, not everything does go smoothly and it is important for the clerk in these situations to be resigned to fate and to remember that the fact the recommendation has been made (and, more generally, a good day's work has been put in) is sufficient in itself (1a).
      Yes, the clerk is a medium in the truest sense (while working with media - ha ha!): like a clairvoyant at a seance, in other words. (Trust me, some customers are sufficiently difficult to work with that summoning the spirits of the dead would be preferable!) At the relationship's apex (i.e. customer and movie are connected or brought together by the medium or clerk), the medium may become a sort of polished looking glass or mirror: looking into it, the viewer (i.e. the customer) discovers aspects of their own person or nature which were never known or even suspected. The medium's job is thus a balancing act, giving and taking in a highly dynamic relationship: not easy!
      Yes, 1b is definitely applicable to many other work situations, and, yes, you are correct - in many cases, the customer is fully aware of what is transpiring and recognizes the clerk's (or waiter's or salesperson's or interior decorator's or realtor's or...) intention, namely: to initiate an endgame to the transaction which, while not ideal, at least will enable both parties to move on to other things!
      Excellent point! As I have said elsewhere, the customer is also a worker. In your example, you are merely "doing your job" in reading the signs which the worker has provided for you, just as the worker will collect and interpret the signs which you yourself put forth!
      I would not worry about being overly-exuberant in a video store: the reverse, being overly-staid, is what should be avoided!
      No, recommending movies is too calming - when I dream that I am at the video store it involves something anxiety-ridden, such as not being able to find a particular DVD or the computer not working!

      Delete
  2. 1. Absolutely, we all have our tried-and-trues although I try not to rely upon them too much. For example, Waiting for Guffman is a great movie but I feel that I am not pushing myself or the customer(s) far enough if I just keep urging Waiting for Guffman on everyone. (Besides, there are very few of us video store clerks left, meaning that those still around need to up our game!)
    2. Sure, that's what makes working with human beings so interesting: a person may come in, know a lot about film, and we're talking and bouncing things off of one another, but, once I begin suggesting movies, it's "no... no... no...." Nowadays, I'm pretty good about not letting it get to me - after all, sometimes people are just not having a good day and are kinda petulant and cranky (myself included, obviously!). But, in general, I enjoy a good challenge, and, importantly, I'm not too proud to hand them off to a co-worker or even just say, "Well, I've tried. Good luck!"
    3. I try to keep it to just a few questions, usually: "Do you have a favorite movie or a few favorite movies (or genres)?", "What have you seen recently that you've liked?", and "What are you in the mood to see?" Certain genres can be a challenge, though, especially comedy and horror because they come with such widely divergent options. If I get a request for a good comedy, my immediate next question will be: "What sorts of movies do you find funny?" or "What sorts of comedies do you like?" Horror is probably the toughest, though, just because the terrain virtually guarantees that you are usually dealing with rank amateurs looking for "a really scary movie." I always tell people at such times that a horror film does not need to be scary, merely unsettling or eerie (with some horror films being arguably more comedic than anything!). (I usually do not mention that there are plenty of horror films made today that are scary (they will make you jump and nervous and all that) but are absolutely wretched motion pictures that should never be seen.) However, if the customer insists on seeing "a really scary movie," I simply ask "What sorts of movies do you find scary?" and proceed from there. The key in these cases is discovering what the customer's definition of funny or scary is (like I said: widely divergent interpretations!): once you have oriented your map to their magnetic north, simply guide them in the right direction.
    4. Hmmm, a code specifically for the customer - I think it's more-or-less the same as the clerk's... just sorta reflected across the axis. Don't get hung up on the name: I call it the Video Store Clerk's Code but really it's just The Code or even A Code. See, the Code should be understood to be applicable in a wider sense to potentially anything and any situation. At a certain point, the distinctions between all types of work begin to dissolve and all forms of labor resemble one another - even the labor of being a customer. (Which is not a joke, mind you! Being a customer is work.) Truthfully, we are all linked: laborers are customers and customers laborers. What the Code aims to do, more than anything, is aid the practitioner in cultivating a streamlined state of mind or consciousness which allows for smoother navigation of the often-tumultuous pathways of modern society. The Code is a recognition that the modern workplace is a frequently stressful and dehumanizing environment and attempts to even the balance in favor of the worker through empowerment and, ideally, even enlightenment. I don't know, maybe the customer's code should be: "Quit talking and ring me up so that I can go home!" Whaddya think?!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a great introduction to the communicative side of things in the video store, Rob. Please flesh out this framework by providing more day to day examples of each one as it manifests itself! I have always been fascinated by the complexity of service encounters, having worked as busboy and waiter and cafeteria worker, but I never applied communication theory to these interactions. I enjoyed reading about your process of adaptation, of overdoing it ("widescreen") and underdoing it. I like your argument that workers are customers and customers are also workers, and your assertion that service work is "emotional labor."

    And also, as I said to you on the phone yesterday, please devote a couple of posts to how you have changed the video store's operations to adapt it to the changed circumstances of the pandemic. That would be priceless -- this old and nearly obsolete form still adapting.

    ReplyDelete